Comments on: Sad: Abe Arganiosa’s Ignorance, part 2 (the miter of Egyptian paganism)

By: Brothercool

Brothercool — Mon, 15 Aug 2011 06:17:30 +0000

By: resbak

resbak — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:54:15 +0000

You said “That is a FALLACIOUS ASSUMPTION.The title LORD is only applicable to GOD. ”
If you believe that then you should also believe that Abraham saw, talked to and fed three gods.

By: resbak

resbak — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:48:09 +0000

You sound frustrated. Why don’t just admit and accept the fact that Bro Felix Y. Manalo did not found a church called Iglesia Ni Cristo? He never said he did, he never taught it and neither did his successors.

Re-emergence because the first century Church of Christ apostatized or turned away from the true faith preached by the Lord Jesus and his Apostles.

The “gates of hell” in the verse means death or grave.

By: dandelionne

dandelionne — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:34:16 +0000

FROM RESBAK:”Why? Because God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ..
Is he God because he was made Lord? No.”

That is a FALLACIOUS ASSUMPTION.The title LORD is only applicable to GOD.

The Catholic belief is there is ONLY ONE TRUE GOD but yet 3 persons: Father,Son and Spirit!

If you read John 17 first verse, a human Jesus is clearly depicted but when you arrive on verse 5

“Now glorify me, Father, WITH YOU, with the GLORY that I HAD WITH YOU BEFORE THE WORLD BEGAN.” (JOHN 17:5 )

Now how can a human being says “with the GLORY that I HAD WITH YOU BEFORE THE WORLD BEGAN.”? BEFORE THE WORLD BEGAN!

Unless if you understand He is both DIVINE and HUMAN as evidenced in 1 TIMOTHY 3:16

“And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.”

By: dandelionne

dandelionne — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:19:00 +0000

FROM RESBAK:”You said “Indeed it is not included in your doctrines“. Thank you. That’s all you need.
We don’t base our belief on Google.
It’s an anniversary. In case you’re wondering, an anniversary is a remembrance of a notable event. The notable event is the re emergence of the church built by Christ, the Iglesia Ni Cristo.”

WOW.What a justification for your belief. That is more like fantasy!

I didn’t say that you have to base your belief in Google.

Are you sure your anniversary is due to a celebration of the re-emergence of the Church? When plainly,its the date when Felix Manalo FOUNDED your church and you are always DENYING THAT FACT!

As you say RE-EMERGENCE. SO WHERE WAS YOUR CHURCH BEFORE IT RE-EMERGE? SO BY LOGIC,YOU HAD NO CONTINUITY FROM THE EARLY CHURCH!

Re-emergence of the Church by Christ? From what? Corruption?

But Jesus promised, “You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church, and the GATES OF HELL WILL NOT prevail AGAINST IT” (Matt. 16:18).

Clearly your beliefs CONTRADICTS the promise of Jesus to His Church.

By: resbak

resbak — Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:29:50 +0000

You said “Indeed it is not included in your doctrines“. Thank you. That’s all you need.
We don’t base our belief on Google.
It’s an anniversary. In case you’re wondering, an anniversary is a remembrance of a notable event. The notable event is the re emergence of the church built by Christ, the Iglesia Ni Cristo.

By: resbak

resbak — Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:25:12 +0000

Why? Because God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ..
Is he God because he was made Lord? No. Because there is only one God the Father. Jesus said so himself: Now this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God,

By: dandelionne

dandelionne — Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:18:14 +0000

FROM RESBAK:”Show me a doctrine of the Iglesia Ni cristo which states that Brother Felix Y. Manalo IS THE FOUNDER of the Iglesia Ni Cristo. You won’t find one because it’s not a doctrine of the INC. The Iglesia Ni Cristo doctrine is that founder of the Iglesia Ni Cristo or Church of Christ is the Lord Jesus Christ himself.”

Why do you always put that stick? Indeed it is not included in your doctrines BUT THE MAIN FACT is FELIX MANALO FOUNDED INC! If you do not know that,then who on earth is Felix Manalo? You are always AVOIDING the question. Hwag mo naman akong bolahin. Eh iGOOGLE mo pa si FELIX MANALO and the fact is so plain to see.

Jesus Christ is the FOUNDER OF THE TAGALOG INC? Last checked,Pastor Quiboloy and the Protestants are claiming that too. So

And besides you still DID NOT ANSWER ME WHY DO YOUR CHURCH CELEBRATE ON THE 27TH OF JULY OF EVERY YEAR.

By: dandelionne

dandelionne — Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:10:57 +0000

FROM RESBAK:”The belief of the Iglesia ni Cristo is that Jesus is man.”

Then why apply the title LORD to Jesus Christ when that TITLE is ONLY APPLIED TO GOD.

“I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage” (Ex 20:2-3).

“You shall be holy; for I the Lord your God am holy” (Lev 19:2)

By: resbak

resbak — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:34:36 +0000

- No. There were Apostles.
- No. The Apostles are all deceased by then.
- No. Same as above.
- No. Same as above.
- No. Same as above.
Just because there were INC ministers during those times doesn’t prove a point. What you should ask is if what you’ve enumerated came from or agreed on by the Apostles. And the answered is a resounding No.

Show me a doctrine of the Iglesia Ni cristo which states that Brother Felix Y. Manalo IS THE FOUNDER of the Iglesia Ni Cristo. You won’t find one because it’s not a doctrine of the INC. The Iglesia Ni Cristo doctrine is that founder of the Iglesia Ni Cristo or Church of Christ is the Lord Jesus Christ himself.

If you only basis for being the true Church of Christ is being old then Judaism is the true Church of Christ.